Tomorrow, 7 February, Julian Assange, the face (and heart) of Wikileaks, faces a court hearing to fight extradition to Sweden concerning sex assault claims made against him by two Swedish women. The hearing is expected to take two days. There is suspicion that the accusations by the women are politically motivated. The judge is expected to defer the decision. If the ruling goes against Assange, he will appeal the decision all the way up to the supreme court.
Sofia Wilen and Anna Ardin
(Photos courtesy of Whyfame.com posted Dec 8 2010, but a number of sites have photos of the two women. One site has also posted their addresses and phone numbers.)
According to the Swedish Justice Ministry, since 2000, the U.S. has requested the extradition of seven citizens from Sweden. Five of the requests were approved, and two were rejected because the suspects were no longer believed to be in Sweden.
Britain and the U.S. signed a fast-track extradition treaty in 2003 intended to speed the transfer of terror suspects. Since it came into force in April 2007, 23 people have been extradited from the U.K. to the U.S., according to British government figures. Extradition lawyer Karen Todner said Assange would probably stand a better chance of resisting extradition to the U.S. if he were in Sweden than if he were in the U.K.
Some questions arise as to whether the Swedish government has been influenced by pressure from the US to seek Assange's detention. However, most Swedish legal experts agree prosecutors would never accept orders from politicians, which is illegal. But supporters of Asange note that Sweden has responded to US pressure before, including in the crackdown on file-sharing site The Pirate Bay, and the secret rendition of two Egyptian terror suspects.
No comments:
Post a Comment